In our local election, the differences between Commissioner candidates could not be clearer—not only in policy but also in the very way each campaign is funded. Where some might see a campaign donation as a sign of support, others use it as a transaction, expecting a return on their investment. That’s precisely what’s happening in the race for Douglas County Commissioner. Angela Thomas’ campaign, backed by everyday residents, contrasts sharply with her opponent George Teal’s operation, which is largely funded by those with business interests before the commission. Here’s why that difference matters.
Grassroots Donations: Investing in the Community
Angela Thomas’ campaign is powered by grassroots donors: people from all walks of life who believe in her vision for Douglas County. From teachers and small business owners to parents, students, and retirees, Angela’s supporters are the backbone of this campaign. Every dollar they contribute is a vote of confidence in her plan for responsible governance and a community-centered vision for the future.
These donors aren't seeking favors or expecting special treatment. They’re supporting a candidate they believe will make Douglas County a better place for all. Angela’s commitment to transparency, collective bargaining rights, and responsible budgeting appeals to people who want their tax dollars spent wisely and who expect their Commissioner to prioritize community needs above corporate gain.
George Teal’s Pay-to-Play Donations: A Conflict of Interest?
In stark contrast, George Teal’s donor base is packed with individuals and businesses that often have business before the commission. This pay-to-play culture creates a troubling conflict of interest, where policies may be shaped by the financial interests of a few rather than the needs of many. When developers, contractors, and other business entities pour money into a campaign, it raises the question: Are they supporting a vision or buying influence?
Teal’s track record reveals a history of decisions that appear to benefit donors rather than the community. Whether it’s the allocation of $1.4 million to a small group of lot owners in Larkspur or the controversial $500,000 contract awarded to a private corporation, his financial ties have cast a shadow over his leadership. Not to mention the connection to RWR and the 400 million dollar water scheme. RWR principals and staff donated thousands to George Teal to pay off his 2020 campaign debt. His funding choices have drawn questions from residents who wonder why their taxpayer dollars seem to be going to enrich a select few rather than benefiting the larger community.
Why This Matters for Douglas County
The source of a candidate’s funding speaks volumes about the kind of representative they will be. Grassroots funding means accountability to the people, while pay-to-play funding often results in policies that serve the financial backers. When a candidate's primary supporters are regular citizens, they’re more likely to fight for policies that benefit all of us: well-funded public services, infrastructure improvements, and policies that protect our neighborhoods and natural resources.
But when a candidate is funded by those with vested interests, it's natural to wonder how that influence may shape policy. In a pay-to-play system, everyday citizens risk being left out of the conversation, with critical decisions shaped by the interests of a powerful few.
Join a Campaign That Stands With the People
This election season, there’s a choice. Angela Thomas' campaign is rooted in the kind of support that asks nothing in return but good governance. She is funded by individuals who believe in her dedication to real change. Her promise is simple: she will work for all residents, regardless of their wealth or influence. Meanwhile, George Teal's approach invites a future where our government could increasingly prioritize profit over people.
Angela Thomas stands ready to serve Douglas County with integrity and transparency, championing policies that reflect the needs of our entire community, not just a select few. This election, the choice is ours: a community-centered, grassroots campaign or a campaign fueled by private interests. Let's stand with Angela and choose the kind of leadership that believes in and works for all of us.
コメント